PODCAST EPISODE

Session 162, Inside JABA Series #8: On the Validity of Isolated vs. Synthesized Functional Analysis Methods

Welcome to your Session 162, Inside JABA Series #8: On the Validity of Isolated vs. Synthesized Functional Analysis Methods

Name (as the BACB requires it on your certificate of participation):

Email:

BACB Certificant Number:

According to Dr. Tiger, the idea of developing interventions based off of assessments in ABA

Has a long history in our field.

Is a relatively new practice in our field.

Is not terribly important.

None

From Dr. Tiger’s perspective, one of the more beneficial outcomes from conducting a functional assessment is that it can rule out rule out incorrect functions, and by extension, inappropriate treatments.

True

False

None

According to the analysis in the Tiger and Effertz both the Isolated and Synthesized Contingency Analyses demonstrated acceptable levels of sensitivity.

True

False

None

According to Tiger and Effertz, the Isolated and Synthesized Contingency Analyses differ with respect to

The ability to determine whether a reinforcer is present.

The ability to determine whether the function is automatic negative reinforcement.

The ability to rule out the influence of potential reinforcers.

None

Time's up

Filed under:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply